Adversarial / chaos testing for subscription guaranteed delivery #16

Open
opened 2026-02-19 21:28:32 +00:00 by ash · 0 comments
Owner

What

Prove the guaranteed delivery claim under adversarial conditions.

Scenarios

  • Kill consumer mid-batch → restart → no events lost
  • Kill store mid-write → consumer handles gracefully
  • Network partition between store and consumer
  • Clock skew
  • Extremely slow consumer (10x slower than write rate)
  • Random process crashes (chaos monkey style)
  • Sequence gaps from rolled-back transactions
  • Out-of-order commits (multi-writer)

Method

  • Inject failures via test doubles
  • Verify: every event written is eventually processed exactly as many times as expected
  • Count: total events written == total events processed (after recovery)
## What Prove the guaranteed delivery claim under adversarial conditions. ## Scenarios - Kill consumer mid-batch → restart → no events lost - Kill store mid-write → consumer handles gracefully - Network partition between store and consumer - Clock skew - Extremely slow consumer (10x slower than write rate) - Random process crashes (chaos monkey style) - Sequence gaps from rolled-back transactions - Out-of-order commits (multi-writer) ## Method - Inject failures via test doubles - Verify: every event written is eventually processed exactly as many times as expected - Count: total events written == total events processed (after recovery)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
ash/eskit#16
No description provided.