Comprehensive benchmark suite: eskit vs Myrra #11

New issue

Open

opened 2026-02-19 21:28:31 +00:00 by ash · 0 comments

ash commented

2026-02-19 21:28:31 +00:00

Owner

What

Head-to-head performance comparison between eskit and Myrra.

Benchmarks

Event serialization/deserialization
Store append (single writer)
Store append (concurrent writers)
Store read (various stream sizes)
Projection throughput
CommandBus latency (in-process)
Encryption overhead
Upcasting chain performance
Memory allocations per operation

Method

Same hardware (VPS 143.14.50.71)
Same data shapes
Go benchmark framework
Compare: time/op, allocs/op, bytes/op

Myrra locations

EMFlow: /tmp/emflow/pkg/myrra
YoYoPass (more mature): /tmp/yoyopass/pkg/myrra

Goal

eskit must be faster. Generics over interfaces is our unfair advantage.

## What Head-to-head performance comparison between eskit and Myrra. ## Benchmarks - Event serialization/deserialization - Store append (single writer) - Store append (concurrent writers) - Store read (various stream sizes) - Projection throughput - CommandBus latency (in-process) - Encryption overhead - Upcasting chain performance - Memory allocations per operation ## Method - Same hardware (VPS 143.14.50.71) - Same data shapes - Go benchmark framework - Compare: time/op, allocs/op, bytes/op ## Myrra locations - EMFlow: /tmp/emflow/pkg/myrra - YoYoPass (more mature): /tmp/yoyopass/pkg/myrra ## Goal eskit must be faster. Generics over interfaces is our unfair advantage.